Frequently Asked Questions
Find clear answers to common Home Health, Hospice, and general compliance questions, all in one place.
Have a question? Reach out to us!
Home Health Questions
Are home health agencies held responsible for EVERY return to hospital for the same patient? For example, the patient has 3 readmissions during a home health stay, are each of those separately counted against us?
For the 2025 HHVBP measure “Home Health Within Stay Potentially Preventable Hospitalization (PPH)”, the number of risk-adjusted potentially preventable hospitalizations OR potentially preventable observation stays that occur within a home health stay for all eligible stays at the agency will be calculated.
- Planned admissions are not counted (for example planned hip replacements, planned knee replacements)
- Whether or not the hospitalization or observations are preventable or not will be determined by the codes the hospital places on their claim
The measure-specific exclusions for this measure are:
- HH stays that begin with a LUPA claim
- Stays in which the patient receives service from multiple agencies during the home health stay
- Patients not continuously enrolled in Medicare part A Fee for Service for the 12 months prior to the home health admission date through the end of the home health stay
- Patients less than 18 years old
Do we need to complete OASIS on all of our current patients (for example Private Pay) as of 7/1/25 if they are an ongoing patient with a SOC date of 6/23/21 (like a recert OASIS)? Or only if they have a new SOC date after 7/1/25?
The implementation of mandatory all payer OASIS Collection and Submission is for all SOC OASIS 07/01/2025 and after. You will also be required to collect and submit all subsequent OASIS for these patients (Recert, TF, ROC, DAH, DC, Other Follow Up/SCIC etc).
The Final OASIS E1 Manual states the following:
OASIS data collection and submission are required for patients with any pay source who are not exempt from OASIS data collection, and who begin receiving home health care services with an OASIS SOC M0090 data on or after July 1, 2025. The requirement includes the SOC OASIS and any subsequent OASIS time point assessments relevant to the patient’s home health stay (that is, resumption of care, recertification, other follow-up, transfer, discharge, and death at home).
- Patients under the age of 18, patients receiving maternity services, and patients receiving only personal care, housekeeping and/or chore services continue to be excluded from OASIS data collection and submission requirements.
Reference: CMS Home Health OASIS All Payer Q&As
Is the 30-Day Therapy Reassessment still active?
Yes. Per the Medicare Benefit Manual Chapter 7, the 30-day reassessment is still a requirement. The documentation states “At least once every 30 days, for each therapy discipline for which services are provided, a qualified therapist (instead of an assistant) must provide the ordered therapy service, functionally reassess the patient, and compare the resultant measurement to prior assessment measurements. The therapist must document in the clinical record the measurement results along with the therapist’s determination of the effectiveness of therapy, or lack thereof.
We are needing some clarification on what is considered a complete referral that gives the "start" time of the 48hrs for home health SOC to be completed?
See the following from the OASIS Guidance Manual, Chapter 3, Item M0104 – regarding Timely Initiation of Care, which states:
- A valid referral is considered received when the agency has received adequate information about a patient (such as name, address/contact info, and diagnosis and/or general home care needs) to initiate patient assessment and confirmed that the referring physician/allowed practitioner or another physician/allowed practitioner, will provide the plan of care and ongoing orders.
- In cases where home care is requested by a hospitalist who will not be providing an ongoing plan of care for the patient, the agency must contact an alternate or attending physician/allowed practitioner. The agency will note the date the alternate or attending physician/allowed practitioner agreed to follow the patient as the referral date (M0104) unless referral details are later updated or revised.
- Enter the date of the most recent/latest referral
- If Start of Care or Resumption of Care is delayed due to the patient’s condition or physician/allowed practitioner request (for example, extended hospitalization), the date the agency received the updated/revised referral for home care services would be considered the date of referral.
The Timely Initiation of Care quality measure, as well as the CoP, will be based on whether the initial assessment was conducted either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician-ordered SOC date. If you are pursuing a physician ordered SOC date, you must contact the referring provider and get that order date within the 48-hour period, or you will be out of compliance.
Surveyors will count 48 hours from the time that the referral is received whether a physician has been verified to cover the patient or not. If there is a question as to being able to obtain the physician confirmation of home health coverage, the agency should seek documentation of a specific SOC date in the referral order.
For Home Health, when a patient goes into a SNF, swing bed or psychiatric hospital are we always supposed to Discharge the patient?
The short answer is No, CMS does not mandate that you always discharge (and readmit if a referral is received). The rationale is a bit more complex as the decision to transfer/resume vs. discharge and readmit has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the decision to DC vs TRN based on impact to payment and quality measures.
However, IF a patient is in a facility (SNF, Acute Care Hospital/ACH, Swing Bed, etc.) on the 60th day of the certification period, the patient SHOULD be discharged.
In other cases, the decision to TRN and Resume vs DC and Readmit would be based on:
- Facility Setting (PAC vs. Acute Care) and/or
- Impact to PDGM Payment, if applicable.
- In cases where a patient is discharged to a facility – regardless of type – Medicare is now applying the regulation, to claims processing, that if the patient returns/resumes within the same 30-day period the discharge will be nonallowed for billing purposes and the claim RTP for correction
- If the patient is discharged to a facility - regardless of type – and has a new SOC on day 31 or later of the episode – the agency can receive institutional credit on that new claim if the discharge happened within the prior 14 days (this is the only way to get the credit for a SNF, LTCH, Rehab or Psych readmission)
- Note: if the patient is admitted to an acute care hospital and resumed in the last 14 days of a period the next 30-day claim will get institutional credit.
Can you clarify if the Discharge to Community measure is still utilized in Home Health Value Based Purchasing in 2025?
The Discharge to Community measure that was based on OASIS responses is no longer utilized in the HHVBP measure calculations. It has been replaced by the Discharge to Community Post Acute Care measure (DCT-PAC). The measure is the risk-adjusted prediction of the number of HH stays resulting in a discharge to the community (Patient discharge code 01 or 81) without an unplanned admission to an Acute Care Hospital or LTCH or death in the 31 days post-discharge observation window. This is a measure that will cover two years of data and it will be derived from hospital claims. See the model guide at this link for more information.
If you have 5 days to complete an OASIS after the initial visit, does that mean you don't really have to submit to iQIES for 30 days?
For a Start of Care, OASIS Guidance states that the assessing clinician has 5 days to continue to gather needed information to complete the Comprehensive Assessment. When additional time is needed to gather information during this 5-day window, the clinician is to note the last date that information was received to complete the assessment in M0090, Date Assessment Completed.
NOTE: the 5-day assessment window does not apply to other types of assessments. The 5-day window is also not just to complete the documentation of information already received at the SOC visit; the window is to get additional clarification from the provider, the family, or the care team such as the PT who is evaluating within the 5-day window, for example.
OASIS Assessments must be submitted and accepted to iQIES within 30 days of the recorded M0090 date.
When is the new selection period for Review Choice Demonstration (RCD) for Ohio? Should we ever consider the Spot Check Option?
The window for the new cycle selection for Ohio, North Carolina & Florida opened on April 1 and will close on April 14, 2025. Oklahoma's ended in March, Illinois & Texas are in July.
The options to choose from are #1 Pre-Claim Review, #2 Post Payment Review. If you were 90% successful with affirmations or approval under one of those two options, review in the subsequent selection period you may select: #1 Pre-Claim Review, #3 Selective Post Payment Review or #4 Spot Check Review.
Your question was specifically about Spot Check, which includes that 5% of your claims will be chosen for ADR REVIEW and this is PRE-PAYMENT.....meaning as you bill the claim they will be selected for ADR review and the chart will have to be submitted for medical review and that can take 60+ days to get the results and if approved you will then be paid. If you have an agency that bills 1,000 claims per month this means that you will have 6,000 in 6 months and 300 of them will be pulled for medical review. You are not only looking at delayed payment of 300 claims, but you are facing the possibility of denials that would require a lengthy appeal process and possibly being referred to additional medical reviews such as UPIC if the denials are significant.
I also want to reiterate that that if you select #3 there is no clear answer as to the calculation of identifying a Statistically Valid Sample of charts, not to mention the fact that if you select this one you are stuck there until 2029.
In our experience, being under Pre-Claim review, while it might seem tedious, has become a way for agencies to ensure that, at least initially, the certification passes medical review scrutiny and does NOT subject the entire chart to medical review nor does it delay cash flow.
We are trying to find a breakdown of OASIS E-1 M0 items that affect reimbursement and a list of OASIS E-1 M0 items that affect outcomes measures. We plan on using this for auditing purposes. Can you refer us to the right place to obtain this list?
Thank you for your questions regarding OASIS items and their use. Each item used in the OASIS data set is used in some capacity, but they are not all used for the same purpose. This makes it difficult to select only those used for reimbursement or outcomes measures.
For example, The M1800 items plus M1033 are used to calculate the functional domain in PDGM payment, which impacts your Medicare payments. However, the GG Items (GG0130 and GG0170) are used to determine the patient’s functional status for the Discharge Function Score in Home Health Value Based Purchasing.
M1021, Primary Diagnosis and M1023, Secondary diagnoses, are used for risk adjusting the Potentially Preventable Hospitalization measure for HHVBP (as well as M1021 and the M1700 items).
For a list of all the OASIS Items used in Home Health Quality Reporting program, this link to HHQRP Outcomes Measures will open a table with all the measures and the items used to calculate them.
This link opens a table with all the process measures used in HHVBP; some of these are also used in reports your surveyor pulls prior to on-site survey, such as the Potentially Avoidable Events reports.
Because of the comprehensive nature of the OASIS and its use, we strongly encourage agencies to review ALL the OASIS items and provide education to staff on the OASIS data set regularly. Should you need assistance with either, please let us know - we can help!
In my agency, I review all the DC OASIS for accuracy and wanted to get your input when the clinician’s documentation is lacking. I will make recommended changes when, for example, a clinician enters M1800s all ONE responses which is truly a conflict in responses. So, if I email the clinician, then I make the change into the OASIS and enter it directly as, “As per clinician response”, is this practice acceptable or do you suggest that I enter a note into the patient record specifically stating my email communications with the clinician?
The OASIS E-1 Guidance Manual states that:
“Agencies may have the comprehensive assessment including OASIS, if applicable, completed by one clinician. If collaboration with other health care personnel and/or agency staff is utilized, the agency is responsible for establishing policies and practices related to collaborative efforts, including how assessment information from multiple clinicians will be documented within the clinical record, ensuring compliance with applicable requirements, and accepted standards of practice.”
The manual also states that “Any differences between OASIS coding should be discussed jointly by the assessing clinician and auditor to determine the reasons for the differences and to ensure that assessing clinicians fully understand the OASIS items and related guidance.”
Given this guidance, best practice would reflect that a discussion between the reviewer and the assessing clinician occurred, whether verbally or in writing, and that the clinician who is responsible for the comprehensive assessment agrees with the changes made. Agency policy would dictate how this is documented; some agencies document on a care coordination note with the assessing clinician re-signing and “locking” the comprehensive assessment after review to reflect this agreement and to affix the clinician signature to the legal document in the software platform.
Are patients who have Medicare listed as a secondary payer included in OASIS based outcome measures? It has always been my understanding they would be, but I am having difficulty finding the resource that addresses that question regarding primary vs secondary payer.
Yes, if Medicare is listed as a pay source for home health, the data is used in Home Health Quality Reporting Program OASIS-based measures.
The Home Health Quality Reporting Program Quality Measures User’s Manual, Version 3.0 states:
“The OASIS-based quality measures in the Home Health Quality Reporting Program will continue to report only data for Medicare fee-for-service, Medicare Advantage (Medicare managed care), Medicaid, and Medicaid managed care.”
It also states in Chapter 3 of this manual that quality episodes [for use in HHQRP] are not created for patients who meet OASIS measure exclusions or who do not have Medicare Traditional fee-for-service, Medicare HMO/Managed Care/Advantage plans, Medicaid Traditional or Medicaid HMO/Managed Care plans, or are receiving only personal care, homemaker, or chore services.
Some of our Managed Medicare payers are applying the VBP after sequestration instead of before. I have searched CMS and have called them to find out where the documentation is housed that states the VBP adjustment should be deducted before sequestration and I am unable to obtain this. Are you able to provide the article information at CMS where I can find this instruction so that I can reach out to the payers to request that they correct their system setup?
The HHVBP adjustment should be applied prior to sequestration. There are two resources for your review and use regarding the VBP adjustment and sequestration. Question 5008 of the HHVBP FAQs states: Through the expanded HHVBP Model, CMS will adjust each HH PPS final claim payment amount to a home health agency (HHA) with a “through date” in the HHVBP payment year by an amount up to or down to the maximum applicable percent. Applying the sequestration adjustment is the final step in processing a claim.
- Home Health Value Based Purchasing Newsletter, March 2025. - See Page 4 of 6.
- Home Health Value based Purchasing Frequently Asked Questions, CMS, March 2025. - See Page 8 of 70, Question 5008.
This question is regarding Dual coverage patients receiving denial from Medicare advantage provider so we can bill Medicaid for Long term medication management. The Patient is homebound so MA plan won't provide denial. I was unaware that we are able to do long term medication set up as a skilled need and bill to Medicare and or Medicare Advantage plans?
Medically necessary skilled care is defined in section 40 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Home Health Chapter 7. This layer of coverage is in addition to beneficiary eligibility criteria covered in sections 20 and 30 of this manual. Additionally, CGS, your Home Health Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) provides information on coverage on their website. Keep in mind that some Medicare Advantage plans cover things that Traditional Medicare does not. You will need to check with the specific MA plan to determine.
Whether or not Medicaid covers long-term medication management is dependent on the individual Medicaid insurance policy’s coverage guidelines. Please refer to the Medicaid payer’s insurance contract and/or coverage criteria for information as to whether long-term medication management is a covered billable service.
Does a Home Health agency have to provide Aide services if there are no Aides in the area to hire? Do other staff need to fill that role or can you just not have that service available?
No. According to CMS’ Home Health Conditions of Participation, the Home Health Agency must provide skilled nursing services and at least one other therapeutic service. The therapeutic services include PT, OT, S-LP, MSW or HH Aide services. So, CMS does not require aide services; please confirm that the State you are providing care in also does not require this. If you list that you provide home health aide services, you will need to have other qualified staff members provide the aide services (such as your LVNs, or RNs). You may also provide the aide services “indirectly”, meaning contracted staffing services. If you decide you are no longer going to provide home health aide services, you will need to update your service line listing with the state, CMS and on your website and marketing brochures and other public facing information. You will also need to update your Acceptance to Service Policy, which is the new CoP mandated policy effective this January 1, 2025.
Are we still supposed to be monitoring our 30-day readmission statistics?
The home health quality 30 day readmission measure was retired and was replaced by the new measure “Home Health Within Stay Potentially Preventable Hospitalization” or PPH measure.
This is a claims-based measure that is risk adjusted. The measure calculates potentially preventable hospitalization or potentially preventable observation stays that occur within a home health “stay” for all eligible patients at each agency.
A “stay” is a sequence of HH payment episodes separated from other HH payment episodes by at least two (2) days.
For HHVBP, only the Medicare fee-for service (traditional) patients are included in this measure.
Exclusions include:
- Home health stays that begin with a LUPA claim adjustment
- Stays in which the patient receives service from multiple agencies during the home health stay
- For patients not continually enrolled in Traditional Medicare for the 12 months prior to the home health admission date through the end of the home health stay
Whether a Hospitalization or Observation stay is preventable or not is based on the diagnosis listed on the hospital claim. To clarify, planned admissions are not included in the calculations unless the planned stay includes one of the acute diagnoses from this designated list; in that case it would be reclassified as unplanned.
To view details of the PPH Measure, click here.
I need some insight on OASIS submissions for HMO/private patients. When we export OASIS of HMO or Medicare patients, it does not contain the Medicare number because they may not have one or it is a member ID and not a Medicare number. When we exported it and uploaded to IQIES, it got rejected due to not having a Medicare number.
While we are required to submit the OASIS, it's not accepting it because the patient doesn't have a Medicare number. Can you direct me to someone who might have an answer?
For Medicare HMO or Advantage Plans, be sure to note M0063, Medicare Number is answered properly. The OASIS manual states that the patient’s Medicare Beneficiary Identifier should be entered if available, even if the patient is a member of a Medicare HMO, Another Medicare Advantage Plan, or Medicare Part C. If the Medicare MBI is not available, mark “NA – No Medicare”.
Do not enter the HMO ID number. The Medicare number (if known) should be entered even if Medicare FFS is not the primary payment source for this episode of care.
If these items are answered correctly, and your OASIS continues to be rejected, contact the Home Health Quality Help Desk at homehealthqualityquestions@cms.hhs.govor the iQIES help desk atiqies@cms.hhs.gov
Would it negatively impact us in billing, quality measures or efficiencies to do an OASIS transfer when a home health patient is admitted to the hospital for greater than 24 hours regardless of observation or inpatient status?
OASIS guidance states that an OASIS transfer should be completed when the patient is admitted for 24 hours or longer for a reason(s) other than diagnostic testing. If the patient does not meet these requirements, then no OASIS TF should be performed. If the patient does not meet TF assessment criteria, your agency policy would dictate if you would complete an Other Follow-Up Assessment/ Significant Change In Condition (SCIC) comprehensive assessment following the patients return home from the hospital for observation stays or emergency department visits.
Traditional Medicare Fee for Service patients who are re-admitted or held in observation status while on home health services are counted in the claims-based measure “Home Health Within Stay Potentially Preventable Hospitalization” or PPH measure. You can find additional information on this outcomes measure, which is a HHQRP and HHVBP here.
If a home health agency (HH) is seeing a patient for wound care (i.e.)2x / weekly and the wound clinic (ordering provider and provider signing HH orders) is providing their visit in the home verses in the clinic 1x / weekly. We are both billing Medicare Part A; does the home health agency have to provide wound care supplies also for the visit the wound care clinic provides? The wound care clinic is a free standing business where the patient could go into the office but they offer "mobile" / home visits for convenience.
HH plan of care would read SN 2x / weekly and however, the wound care clinic states we should provide supplies for their visit also. Supplies are being ordered based on our frequency and plan of care.
Wound care clinic states per their communication with CMS is that the HH would provide all supplies. I cannot find this literature or regulations. Can you provide any insight?
For individuals under a home health plan of care, payment for all services (Nursing, therapy, home health aides and medical social services) and routine and non-routine medical supplies, with the exception of certain injectable osteoporosis drugs, DME, and furnishing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using a disposable device is included in the HHPPS base payment rates. HHAs must provide the covered home health services (except DME) either directly or under arrangement, and must bill for such covered home health services.
The Consolidated Billing List under Home Health PPS can be downloaded here: Home Health Consolidated Billing Master Code List
During one of your recent education sessions, one of the items you discussed was the narrative note with the assessment and the outline that should be used for this note. You mentioned a resource where it specifically defines what should be there. Please clarify?
The guidelines for documentation for medical necessity as stated in Publication 100-2, Chapter 7 Medicare Benefit Policy Manual – Home Health. In section 40.1 CMS defines skilled, medically necessary nursing services coverage and documentation. Additionally, in section 40.2, CMS defines the same criteria as required for coverage in Skilled Therapy Services notes. In part these sections read:
“As is outlined in home health regulations, as part of the home health agency (HHA) Conditions of Participation (CoPs), the clinical record of the patient must contain progress and clinical notes. Additionally, in Pub. 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 10; “Home Health Agency Billing”, instructions specify that for each claim, HHAs are required to report all services provided to the beneficiary during each 30-day period, which includes reporting each visit in line-item detail. As such, it is expected that the home health records for every visit will reflect the need for the skilled medical care provided. These clinical notes are also expected to provide important communication among all members of the home care team regarding the development, course and outcomes of the skilled observations, assessments, treatment and training performed. Taken as a whole then, the clinical notes are expected to tell the story of the patient’s achievement towards his/her goals as outlined in the Plan of Care. In this way, the notes will serve to demonstrate why a skilled service is needed.”
Therefore the home health clinical notes must document as appropriate:
- the history and physical exam pertinent to the day’s visit, (including the response or changes in behavior to previously administered skilled services) and the skilled services applied on the current visit, and
- the patient/caregiver’s response to the skilled services provided, and
- the plan for the next visit based on the rationale of prior results,
- a detailed rationale that explains the need for the skilled service in light of the patient’s overall medical condition and experiences,
- the complexity of the service to be performed, and
- any other pertinent characteristics of the beneficiary or home
Clinical notes should be written so that they adequately describe the reaction of a patient to his/her skilled care. Clinical notes should also provide a clear picture of the treatment, as well as “next steps” to be taken. Vague or subjective descriptions of the patient’s care should not be used. For example, terminology such as the following would not adequately describe the need for skilled care:
- Patient tolerated treatment well
- Caregiver instructed in medication management
- Continue with POC
Objective measurements of physical outcomes of treatment should be provided and/or a clear description of the changed behaviors due to education programs should be recorded in order that all concerned can follow the results of the applied services.
We believe it is primarily our long standing, higher acuity, Medicaid clients driving the low ADL outcome stats. We would like to evaluate how to approach the OASIS in the best way possible with this client population. What algorithms are capturing those charts to even include in the outcome data given some of them we believed we were answer ring in a way that would exclude them?
Another consideration is medication management. We provide medication management primarily under the Veterans Administration and Medical Assistance waivers, but these payers require OASIS booklets. Our agency has always approached medication management and the necessary assessment, teaching, and compliance monitoring surrounding that process as a skilled nursing service. Should we be thinking about that differently, at least in regards to the OASIS submission?
All skilled care patients, regardless of payer, must have OASIS data collected and submitted. Currently, OASIS data on non- Medicare or non-Medicaid payers is NOT USED for calculation of outcomes. However, if you are treating medication management patients as “skilled” then they are included in your outcomes data calculations (unless they meet exclusions per OASIS and outcomes specifications).
“Skilled” is defined by the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual for the purpose of the HHQRP and Outcomes. This manual says the following about medication management:
“The prefilling of syringes with insulin (or other medication that is self-injected) does not require the skills of a licensed nurse and, therefore, is not considered to be a skilled nursing service. If the patient needs someone only to prefill syringes (and therefore needs no skilled nursing care on an intermittent basis, physical therapy, or speech language pathology services), the patient, therefore, does not qualify for any Medicare coverage of home health care. Prefilling of syringes for self-administration of insulin or other medications is considered to be assistance with medications that are ordinarily self-administered and is an appropriate home health aide service. (See §50.2.) However, where State law requires that a licensed nurse prefill syringes, a skilled nursing visit to prefill syringes is paid as a skilled nursing visit (if the patient otherwise needs skilled nursing care, physical therapy, or speech-language pathology services), but is not considered to be a skilled nursing service.”
“The administration of oral medications by a nurse is not reasonable and necessary skilled nursing care except in the specific situation in which the complexity of the patient's condition, the nature of the drugs prescribed, and the number of drugs prescribed require the skills of a licensed nurse to detect and evaluate side effects or reactions. The medical record must document the specific circumstances that cause administration of an oral medication to require skilled observation and assessment.”
Filling medication dispensers/boxes or prefilling syringes is not a covered skill under the Medicare benefit. There are some exceptions when the patient has a medically complex regimen with frequent changes and the skills of a SN to teach and monitor on the new/changed/complex medications are needed. However, if the patient is unable to learn the teaching and training, once this is established, the teaching and training is no longer a covered skill.
So, unless the patient is not complex, then “medication management” is not a billable skill. If no skilled service is performed as described in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, then these visits should not be billed to Medicare. Management of medications under a VA program is covered in some contracts, and if so, OASIS may be required, but those patients would be excluded from outcomes measure calculations based on how the payer question on the OASIS is answered. Be sure you are ONLY marking the insurances that are paying for home health care, not all the payers the patient has to choose from.
We Have a question related to whether a plan of care is required in 2 scenarios.
Scenario 1: Agency goes out to assess for admission. Patient is appropriate for admission. Entire assessment is completed, and provider is called for the verbal order for services. Either the provider refuses and we can't locate another signing provider, or provider agrees and later refuses once POC is sent. Either way, we don't have a signing physician. So, we would not need a Plan of Care for billing purposes, but we are divided on whether we need a plan of care for condition of participation reasons. Since we did make 1 or several skilled visits, would we still go through the process of creating the plan of care as if we were going to send it out? We can still handle the technical pieces within our EMR of not sending it out and discharging the patient and writing off. Or would we change the patient to not admitted and not create a plan of care at all, knowing there is no provider to sign.
Scenario 2: Similar to scenario 1, we made a couple of visits and then found out the patient was active with another agency. We don't plan to bill, so would the POC be necessary just because we did provide skilled visits, or not needed at all?
For scenario 1, While you will not need a Plan of Care for billing as no signature will leave you not being able to bill, you would need one for treatment provided, assuming that you documented a verbal confirmation of the plan to provide care, you would be covered for care provided.
For Scenario 2, to support compliance with the Conditions of Participation, you should develop a Plan of Care and have it signed and dated by the physician despite not billing for the services.
Additional criteria that must be met to be compliant for billing and the Conditions of Participation is as follows:
For Home Health Benefits to be covered the following criteria must be met related to the Plan of Care:
According to Medicare Benefit Policy Manual Chapter 7- 30.2 - Services Are Provided Under a Plan of Care Established and Approved by a Physician or Allowed Practitioner (Rev. 10438, Issued: 11-06-20, Effective: 03-01-20, Implementation: 01- 11-21)
Surveyors do not evaluate whether services were billed or not billed.
A situation we have run into is we get an order for example, PT and OT. Our PTs are swamped so OT goes out to do the SOC. At the visit, they complete some billable services (such as provide education, adjust some new devices, etc.) but determine that further OT visits are not warranted. (So, if it was any other discipline, it would be a single-visit episode.) PT goes out a couple days later and completes their evaluation. Is this allowable?
According to the CoPs and Surveyor’s Guidance Manual for Home Health:
§ 484.55(a)(2) When rehabilitation therapy service (speech language pathology, physical therapy, or occupational therapy) is the only service ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care, the initial assessment visit may be made by the appropriate rehabilitation skilled professional. For Medicare patients, an occupational therapist may complete the initial assessment when occupational therapy is ordered with another qualifying rehabilitation therapy service (speech-language pathology or physical therapy) that establishes program eligibility.
§484.55(b)(3) When physical therapy, speech-language pathology, or occupational therapy is the only service ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner, a physical therapist, speech-language pathologist or occupational therapist may complete the comprehensive assessment, and for Medicare patients, determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. For Medicare patients, the occupational therapist may complete the comprehensive assessment when occupational therapy is ordered with another qualifying rehabilitation therapy service (speech-language pathology or physical therapy) that establishes program eligibility.
Since both PT and OT were ordered on the referral, OT can complete the SOC OASIS. OT must document the skilled need for PT during the SOC to establish Medicare eligibility during the SOC visit. There must be at least one skilled visit from PT to establish eligibility; this PT eval visit needs to happen “soon after the SOC”.
The order of visits does not matter.
Eligibility is stated as “confined to the home and has need for skilled nursing care (other than solely venipuncture for the purpose of obtaining a blood sample) on a intermittent basis or physical or speech therapy.”. This is why OT has to have either PT or ST ordered on the referral and that the OT has to document the need for PT on their initial and/or SOC visit.
For additional information, click here.
Is there any (new) guidance on how to correctly answer M1000 especially as related to short term hospitals? At our agency, we only enter a facility type in M1000 if the patient had an actual in-patient stay. Recently, there was discussion to enter the facility type regardless of the payment status - - observation or hospital outpatient surgery if the location was an acute care facility. For example, if a patient had a joint replacement in the hospital vs outpatient setting, should this stay be considered for answering M1000?
No there is no new guidance regarding this. The OASIS Guidance Manual specifies “inpatient facilities” for this item. Observation status and outpatient surgery are not considered inpatient facility discharges so it’s not reportable for this item. Triggers from your EMR might be helpful to initiate conversations regarding treatment plan, but per OASIS guidance ER visits that do not result in an inpatient admission and subsequent inpatient discharge are not reported for M1000.
In our EMR, there is another screen which correlates to the M1000 question whether the patient should be considered “institutional” vs “community. How would entering the date for a non-inpatient stay impact this billing area as we know an observation or hospital outpatient surgery stay is considered “community”?
For PDGM payment, facility claims data is used to determine if the appropriate grouping is “institutional” or “community”. However, we know that not every facility bills timely enough that this claim is present in the Medicare system when we drop our claim. Therefore, CMS allows us to put an occurrence code on our claim to indicate the patient had a qualifying inpatient stay that impacts our Admission Source and Timing grouper. My assumption is that the EMR is using this information to assign the occurrence code on the home health claim when it applies. Note that if the occurrence codes below are on the claim, you will receive institutional credit whether there is a claim to support or not. You must ensure that these codes are only populating the claim when there has been an actual admission and discharge where the discharge date is within 14 days of the beginning of the next 30-day billing period.
Occurrence code 61 “Hospital Discharge Date” may be reported, but is not required, on final claims. Report the DC date of an inpatient hospital admission that ended within the 14 days of the “from” date of the HH period of care.
Occurrence code 62 “Other Institutional Discharge Date” may be reported, but is not required, on final claims. Report the DC date of a SNF, IRF, LTCH, or IPF stay that ended within the 14 days of the from date of the HH period of care.
For more information on the use of occurrence codes in billing home health claims, see The Medicare Claims Processing Manual – Chapter 10.
Can we address a couple of questions to make sure we’re interpreting the new rules correctly? I also want to go over operative note using it as F2F encounter. I also use a statement whenever the certifying physician is different from the F2F physician. I receive many referrals from inpatient physicians and want to verify if associates can also sign the POC when another associate performed the F2F. For example, a physician performed the F2F but his associate whom, is the physician assistant, will be signing POC.
The only change to the face-to-face encounter rule is that any allowed practitioner can perform the encounter rather than only the certifying provider or directly referring facility. The certifying provider will need to certify the date of the compliant encounter in the certification statement.
When an operative note is used as the face-to-face encounter, it must be accompanied by a pre-op note, or post-op note to ensure that the condition being treated in home health is addressed and also because the patient is unable to participate in a two-way “face-to-face” encounter when under anesthesia. An operative note alone will not be compliant since it does not meet the requirements.
The certifying provider must include the date of the compliant F2F encounter as part of their certification statement.
The F2F encounter may be performed by any qualifying practitioner and is not limited to the certifying practitioner or a practitioner from a facility admission. Be very clear that regardless of who provides the F2F, it must still meet all the requirements – Within 90 days prior to the Start of Care or within 30 days after. Must be an actual visit note from the practitioner that is signed and dated. Must contain support for skilled need for home health and homebound status. Must document treatment to the primary reason for the home health admission.
Hospice Questions
We need clarification on some specifics regarding NP or PA as an attending agent for a hospice patient. We request the MD providing oversight for these practitioners to “act” as the attending physician by signing the necessary attestation and initial CTI, and the “Plan of Care” for certification periods- But I am thinking there’s other ways to handle this. I am hoping you can explain how we can have NP or PA function as designated Attending.
The CMS regulations allow the patient to choose a NP or PA as their attending physician. However, if the attending/supervising physician for the NP/PA is not specifically chosen and is not named on the Hospice Election Statement, then that physician can’t perform as their attending and sign the POC and CTI.
If the patient chooses a NP or PA as their attending, then the hospice physician alone would complete and sign the written certification. NP/PAs cannot certify a patient for hospice care but can be involved in the patient’s plan of care.
Regulations: §418.102 Condition of participation: Medical director
NPs may function as the “Attending Physician” and may write orders within the scope of their state practice act.
PA’s functioning as the “Attending Physician,” PAs may write orders that are unrelated to the terminal illness, within the scope of their state practice act.
Neither NPs or PAs can function as the physician on the interdisciplinary team or certify terminal illness.
L515 (Rev. 210; Issued:02-03-23; Effective:02-03-23; Implementation:02-03-23)
§418.52(c)(4) Choose his or her attending physician;
Interpretive Guidelines §418.52(c)(4)
Patients have the right to choose their attending physician (generally a provider for whom the beneficiary has a relationship with and is not part of the current hospice staff) and to have this person involved in their medical care in collaboration with the hospice medical staff. An attending physician (if any) can also manage those aspects of his/her health care unrelated to the hospice services being provided.
What data is used to calculate the Hospice Care Index (HCI)?
The HCI or Hospice Care Index is calculated solely from data found on the Hospice Claims. The following is a list of the 10 Indicators:
- 1. Continuous Home Care (CHC) or General Inpatient (GIP) - % of CHC and GIP level of care days reflected on the Medicare claims during the reporting period. (Need to be greater than 0%)
- 2. Gaps in Nursing Visits - Number of Medicare Elections that had Gaps in Nursing Visits greater than 7 days within a 30-day period. (Need to be < 90%)
- 3. Early Live Discharges - % of Early Live Discharges within 7 days of admission compared to other hospice providers (Need to be < 90%)
- 4. Late Live Discharges - % of Late Live Discharges on or after 180 days from the hospice admission compared to other hospice providers (Need to be < 90%)
- 5. Burdensome Transitions (Type 1) - % of Live Discharges from Hospice Followed by Hospitalization and Subsequent Hospice Readmission (Need to be < 90%)
- 6. Burdensome Transitions (Type 2) - % of Live Discharges from Hospice Followed by Hospitalization with the Patient Dying in the Hospital (Need to be < 90%)
- 7. Per-beneficiary Medicare Spending compared to other hospice providers - Calculate by the total # of payments, Medicare paid to hospice providers divided by the total # of hospice beneficiaries served. (Need to be < 90%)
- 8. Nurse Care Minutes per Routine Home Care (RHC) Day - Average SN Care Minutes per RHC Day compared to other hospice providers (Need to be Greater than 10%)
- 9. Skilled Nursing Minutes on Weekends –SN Minutes on the Weekends (Saturday & Sunday) out of all SNV during RHC services days (Need to be Greater than 10%)
- 10. Visits Near Death - The number of Visits Near Death reflected on the Medicare claims compared to other hospice providers. The % of beneficiaries receiving at least one visit by a SN or social worker during the last three days of the patient’s life (Need to be Greater than 10%) - A visit on the date of death, the date prior to the date of death, or two days prior to the date of death).
For additional information: Hospice Care Index Technical Report
What happens with certification requirements when a patient names an Attending Practitioner in the community that is a Nurse Practitioner?
The patient has the right to name an Attending in the community that is a Nurse Practitioner or a Physician Assistant. Neither of these practitioners can CERTIFY the terminal illness of the patient. This means that your Medical Director or physician member of the Hospice IDG will be the only one to provide the verbal and written certification of the patient’s terminal illness.
Is there a resource that explains if a hospice patient has a hospice physician as their attending physician, then that physician can serve as both attending and IDG physician and only one physician signature is required on the initial certification?
The patient has the choice whether to select an attending physician or not at time of election. If the patient does not choose an attending physician; the hospice medical director or other hospice physician assumes responsibility for the patient and only that physician is required to certify the patient at time of initial certification (first 90 days episode).
All subsequent benefit periods - 2nd and subsequent only require certification by the hospice physician even if the patient has chosen an attending physician.
Please see the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual Chapter 9 Sections 10 & 20
We have a situation where the patient was admitted to our Hospice with every conviction that this patient was in their 2nd benefit period, which does not require a Face to Face. The question arises when we bill the claim for the 1st month in the benefit period and the claim goes to RTP status for a prior hospice not finalizing billing. It is at this point that is determined that the previous hospice had the patient for the 2nd benefit period, which makes our admission the 3rd benefit period for the patient. We did not do a Face to Face. What do we do now?
Face to Face Encounters continue to be a nightmare for some hospices when patients are admitted under the incorrect benefit period. First, in the above scenario you will have no other option, but to discharge and readmit the patient in conjunction with a Face to Face being conducted. You will have to absorb the cost from treating the patient during the time they have been on service with you with no reimbursement,
Tips to avoid in the future:
- 1) If there is any evidence that a hospice has been with the patient prior and there is NOT a discharge claim or Notice of Termination/Revocation in place, then you should contact the prior hospice to determine the exact situation and you should proceed with conducting a Face to Face in case it is determined that the patient will be in their 3rd benefit period with you.
- 2) IF IN DOUBT DO A FACE TO FACE! – Reminder – currently the Telehealth Face to Face Encounter Allowance is set to expire March 31, 2025.
Is there any requirement that the hospice physician providing the verbal certification must be the same hospice physician to write the terminal illness narrative?
The hospice physician that provides verbal CTI is not required to be the same hospice physician who complete the written CTI narrative.
The regulation that supports this is in the State Operations Manual appendix A page 275. It is a general Medicare reference: SOM Appendix A (cms.gov) Interpretive Guidelines §482.24(c)(2)
In some instances, the ordering practitioner may not be able to authenticate his or her order, including a verbal order (e.g., the ordering practitioner gives a verbal order which is written and transcribed, and then is “off duty” for the weekend or an extended period of time). In such cases it is acceptable for another practitioner who is responsible for the patient’s care to authenticate the order, including a verbal order, of the ordering practitioner as long as it is permitted under State law, hospital policies and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. Hospitals may choose in their policies to restrict which practitioners it would authorize to authenticate another practitioner’s orders. For example, a hospital could choose to restrict authentication of orders for pediatric patients to practitioners who are privileged to provide pediatric care. (77 FR 29053, May 16, 2012).
Will the HOPE tool compliance 10/1/25-12/31/25 data submissions impact the FY 2027 Annual Payment Update?
The submission of HQRP CY data will impact the corresponding FY APU. The submission of Q4 2025 data will count for the FY 2027 APU calculations. HQRP compliance is based on a full CY of data submissions (HIS/HOPE + CAHPS). The graphic in the HOPE Guidance Manual is just an example to show that submission for the first full year of HOPE data (CY2026) will count toward the FY 2028 APU.
There is concern that there may be issues with the transition from QIES to iQIES for HOPE transmission as both go into effect on 10/01/2025. Having said that there are requests to possibly not utilize the 1st quarter of HOPE data as it is implemented. As of today, May 9, 2025, there will be a direct impact on 2027 APU for HOPE data starting 10/01/2025.
We understand that CMS made some changes to the HOPE document and manual instructions in April. Can you provide us with the specific information?
Yes, there were changes to the HOPE document and some clarifications in the Guidance Manual. In addition, they have now issued an update for the vendors that create the software to extract and transmit the HOPE data.
One barrier we have encountered with Hospice General Inpatient Care in a SNF is the 24 hour RN coverage. In one state in particular, we are finding that facilities do not have an RN on-site 24 hours/day. Is this a strict requirement for GIP?
Yes, this is required based on the following Conditions of Participation:
§ 418.108 Condition of participation: Short-term inpatient care.
Inpatient care must be available for pain control, symptom management, and respite purposes, and must be provided in a participating Medicare or Medicaid facility.
(a) Standard: Inpatient care for symptom management and pain control. Inpatient care for pain control and symptom management must be provided in one of the following:
(1) A Medicare-certified hospice that meets the conditions of participation for providing inpatient care directly as specified in § 418.110.
(2) A Medicare-certified hospital or a skilled nursing facility that also meets the standards specified in § 418.110(b) and (f) regarding 24-hour nursing services and patient areas.
---
§ 418.110 Condition of participation: Hospices that provide inpatient care directly.
A hospice that provides inpatient care directly in its own facility must demonstrate compliance with all of the following standards:
(a) Standard: Staffing. The hospice is responsible for ensuring that staffing for all services reflects its volume of patients, their acuity, and the level of intensity of services needed to ensure that plan of care outcomes are achieved and negative outcomes are avoided.
(1) The hospice facility must provide 24-hour nursing services that meet the nursing needs of all patients and are furnished in accordance with each patient's plan of care. Each patient must receive all nursing services as prescribed and must be kept comfortable, clean, well-groomed, and protected from accident, injury, and infection.
(2) If at least one patient in the hospice facility is receiving general inpatient care, then each shift must include a registered nurse who provides direct patient care.
We need help determining if a scheduled/PRN opioid was initiated or continued. For example, an opioid was initiated upon admission (12/1/25). HUV #1 was done on 12/10/25. How do I answer the Opioid question? Which date should I use, the admission date or the HUV #1 date?
Schedule or PRN Opioids should be noted as initiated or continued on the first date the hospice receives the order for the medication AND hospice staff have instructed the patient/caregiver to start using the medication.
If the patient in your example was instructed to continue either the PRN or Scheduled medication at time of admission and an order was received for the medication by the hospice physician, the initiation date would be 12/1/25, the date of admission. If the hospice physician ordered the medication at time of admission, but instruction to take the medication was not given by hospice staff until 12/10/25, the date of the HUV visit, the HUV visit date would be date of initiation.
In the circumstance when comfort medications are ordered but no instruction to administer the medication has been provided, the medication would not be considered initiated or continued.
This also applies for N0520 Bowel Regimen.
Our current EMR is set up so that an individual person can apply the signatures of all the core IDG members to the IDG update/meeting. Is there a rule that says the IDG meeting document must be signed by each person in attendance (core disciplines)? We have had a paper sign in sheet for years. We've also had times when IDG meetings were on paper, and every discipline hand wrote their particular updates on the page and signed it. When our staff (not the doctor) make entries in the clinical record, those entries are pulled to the IDG as part of the update to the plan of care, they are reviewed in IDG meeting, then there are some additional comment boxes and things to fill in prior to someone "signing" the IDG update. I'm auditing some charts, and the scribe did not apply the signatures of all the staff who were present, and now I'm trying to discern if I am looking for something I don't actually need.
The Medicare regulations do not state that signatures are required on IDG meeting notes; however, please consider that the documentation of each meeting should support that all core members of the IDG participate in the meetings. If a scribe is used, the scribe should note the attendance and include credentials to support participation by all required members. Please ensure your agency policy regarding IDG does not require signatures. If this is the case, signatures by all participants would be required. Another thing to consider is that if the IDG meeting notes are used as updates to the POC with new order, the IDG meeting notes must be signed following signature requirements by a hospice physician.
Does both the oral and written CTI need to be signed by the attending MD? Also, does the CTI narrative done by the hospice MD need to be on the attending MD CTI?
Does both the oral and written CTI need to be signed by the attending MD? Only the initial certification. Verbal certifications/Oral certifications are not required to be signed by the physicians. It is a certification statement obtained by your RN stating that the physician has said that this patient has a six month or less prognosis. If your agency EMR is setup to require it, then it's perfectly fine if they are signed, but it's not required. The initial certification is required to be signed by the hospice physician and the attending physician, if one is chosen, and documented on their Hospice Election Statement.
Additionally, in most agencies the hospice certifying physician completes the written narrative, signs it, and then the attending physician co-signs it. It's perfectly acceptable to do that. You are not required to have two separate narratives. You can have just one with both physicians signing.
In several cases, we sent hospice election consent forms to DPOAs for remote signature on or before the correct hospice admission date. The forms were pre-dated with the date we sent them (intended to reflect the hospice admission date). However, in some instances, the DPOAs did not sign and return the forms until several days later. Our signature software captured the actual signature date and time, which differs from the pre-filled date on the form.
Given this discrepancy between the pre-filled date and the recorded electronic signature timestamp, could you please advise which date should be used as the official hospice election date when submitting to Medicare?
We want to ensure our documentation and billing practices remain fully compliant and would appreciate your guidance on how to handle these situations appropriately.
The issue will be the date the representative signed the election statement and what date the SOC was initiated. If the representative signed the election statement the day after the effective date with the SOC occurring on that same day or after, then there is no issue. However, if the SOC occurred prior the date the election statement was signed, then the election is not valid.
For example, effective date is 2/1/26 on the election statement and it was signed on 2/3/26. Then hospice initiates care on 2/1/26 and all documents including billing reflect 2/1/26, then the patient must be discharged and readmitted if not caught in time. Essentially care was initiated prior to the signature on the form which is not allowed.
Second example, effective date is 2/1/26 on the election statement and it was signed 2/3/26. The SOC is initiated on 2/3/26 and all documents including billing reflect 2/3/26, then there is no issue.
The regulation states:
42 CFR § 418.24 - Election of hospice care.
(4) The effective date of the election, which may be the first day of hospice care or a later date, but may be no earlier than the date of the election statement.
We have a new Medical Director for our Hospice and there is a question/debate regarding the signature date and completion date of the "written" CTI statement (form). Our EMR imbedded form captures the physician's certification note, placing it in the correct location on the form; however, the signature date on the form comes from this note's electronic signature time stamp. Therefore, if the physician does the note BEFORE the actual start date of the new certification (benefit period), the CTI form uses the BEFORE date as the signed date. Reading through the Medicare benefit manual we are believing that this signed date on the written CTI has to be within 2 calendar days AFTER the new certification (benefit period). Is that correct? Can you please provide your expertise and guidance?
Thanks for reaching out to us. Regarding your question below, the regulations state that the CTI must be completed and signed within 15 days prior to or within 2 days after the beginning of the benefit period. If the written CTI is not completed within that timeframe, then a verbal certification is required. From your example below, the written CTI would be in compliance if it completed and signed within 15 days prior to the benefit period. don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any further questions. The regulation is as follows:
20.1 - Timing and Content of Certification
(Rev.13133; Issued: 03-20-25; Effective: 01-01-25; Implementation: 04-21-25)
For the first 90-day period of hospice coverage, the hospice must obtain, no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care is initiated, (that is, by the end of the third day), oral or written certification of the terminal illness by the medical director of the hospice or the physician member of the hospice IDG, and the individual’s attending physician if the individual has an attending physician.
Initial certifications may be completed up to 15 days before hospice care is elected. Payment normally begins with the effective date of election, which is the same as the admission date. If the physician forgets to date the certification, a notarized statement or some other acceptable documentation can be obtained to verify when the certification was obtained.
For the subsequent periods, recertifications may be completed up to 15 days before the next benefit period begins. For subsequent periods, the hospice must obtain, no later than 2 calendar days after the first day of each period, a written certification statement from the medical director of the hospice or the physician member of the hospice’s IDG. If the hospice cannot obtain written certification within 2 calendar days, it must obtain oral certification within 2 calendar days.
General Questions
Am I required to use the new Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for ALL patients, including Medicare Advantage patients?
Yes - Providers must deliver the NOMNC to all beneficiaries eligible for the expedited determination process per Chapter 4, Section 260 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual and Chapter 13, Sections 90.2-90.9 of the Medicare Managed Care Manual. A NOMNC must be delivered even if the beneficiary agrees with the termination of services. Medicare providers are responsible for the delivery of the NOMNC. Providers may formally delegate the delivery of the notices to a designated agent such as a courier service; however, all of the requirements of valid notice delivery apply to designated agents.
The new forms were issued with an expiration date of 11/30/2027. Make sure to use the new forms as of 1/1/2025.
For additional information: Click here
Can you point me to the legislation that extends the telehealth FTF flexibilities until September 2025?
Face to Face telehealth flexibilities were extended through September 30, 2025 as part of the law that delayed the government shutdown for FY 2025. The law, Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 is found here, and specifically Section 2207 is where you will find the Telehealth Flexibilities extension.
SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN TELEHEALTH FLEXIBILITIES. (a) Removing Geographic Requirements and Expanding Originating Sites for Telehealth Services.--Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii), by striking ``ending March 31, 2025'' and inserting ``ending September 30, 2025''; and (2) in paragraph (4)(C)(iii), by striking ``ending on March 31, 2025'' and inserting ``ending on September 30, 2025''.
We often present the NOMNC the week before planned discharge. The assistant (LPTA or LPN) usually provides the notice and enters the effective date as the date that the last visit is showing as scheduled in our EMR. Oftentimes the actual visit date changes to another day during that week, either due to scheduling conflicts or patient request. How should this be handled? If the discharge occurs after the documented effective date on the form, should we revise the effective date, initial and document the reason, and give the patient an updated copy or just leave it as is since the patient was actually given a longer period of time to appeal? If the discharge occurs earlier than the anticipated effective date, as long as there has been at least a 2-day notice do we document the reason for discharge and hold billing for at least 2 days after discharge to give the patient time to appeal? I was thinking that years ago when the NOMNC first started we were told to do that but I'm not sure what the requirement is at this time. At what point should we get a new NOMNC signed if the discharge extends beyond the initially planned effective date?
Ideally, the supervising RN or PT and the LPN or PTA would be communicating weekly regarding their schedule and visits so that an accurate DC date is noted on the NOMNC. However, CMS states the following regarding Amending the Date of the NOMNC:
“If the initial NOMNC was delivered to a beneficiary and the effective date was changed, the provider may amend the notice to reflect the new date. The newer effective date may not be earlier than the effective date of the original notice except in those cases involving the abrupt end of services, as discussed in §260.3.4.
The beneficiary must be verbally notified as soon as possible after the provider is aware of the change. The amended NOMNC must be delivered or mailed to the beneficiary and a copy retained in the beneficiary’s file. If an expedited determination is already in progress, the provider must immediately notify the QIO of the change and provide an amended notice to the QIO.”
Additional information about NOMNC can be found in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 30 – Financial Liability Protections, Section 260.3.
Two Free Evaluations. Two Critical Revenue Functions.
Choose between a receivables performance review or a coding & OASIS accuracy assessment, each designed to give leadership clear, structured insight into a different side of revenue performance.
Free AR Evaluation Analysis
Gain clear visibility into your receivables, build confidence in your billing performance, and take a proactive approach to managing cash flow.
- Clear visibility into how your receivables are performing
- Insight into what’s working well and where payments may be slowing
- A proactive way to manage cash flow with confidence
Free Coding & OASIS Review
A timely review of your charts can uncover missed revenue opportunities and highlight patterns that aren’t visible in standard reporting.
- An objective assessment of coding accuracy and OASIS alignment
- A second look at how consistently documentation supports the codes required
- Clear, practical observations that can be used to validate current performance or fine-tune process
Want Deeper Guidance?
Explore recorded webinars, workshops, and tools in the HPS Alliance, designed to help your team stay informed and compliant.
